![]() BF Skinner suggested that learning a language is like learning any new skill.The nativist linguistic theory postulates that every human being is born with innate language ability.The most significant human invention is arguably language.Language development is a slow process that starts during early childhood.New York: W.Morrow.Main Theories of Language Development Takeaways: Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. According to Chomsky, the primary challenge for this alternative approach to language learning is adequately explaining how children produce word forms and sentences that they do not experience in the environment and, thus, have no opportunity to learn. Some contemporary cognitive scientists, such as David Rumelhart and James McClelland, as well as others, view language learning as the result of general learning principles, rather than language-specific mechanisms. Skinner published the book Verbal Behavior, in which he argued that all types of language behavior were learned after birth through the same learning processes that are used for all human learning. Some researchers have rejected the notion that language acquisition is aided by innate knowledge. Furthermore, there was ample anecdotal evidence that individuals who attempt to learn a second language after puberty rarely achieve a level of proficiency comparable to that of one who learns the language during childhood. Individuals born with severe hearing loss who were not exposed to a signed language until after puberty typically had not been able to achieve nativelike proficiency. Such individuals, such as Victor, the wild child, and Genie, had not been able to master the grammatical intricacies of sentence construction. Case studies of children raised without sufficient exposure to human language appeared to support the critical period hypothesis. ![]() Evidence for the Lenneberg’s critical period hypothesis for human language was drawn from a variety of sources. ![]() For many years, researchers in zoology had recognized the existence of critical periods of development for a range of nonhuman animal species, such as songbirds, ducklings, horses, dogs, and sheep. After puberty, humans are biologically unable to master the intricacies of natural language. In 1967, Lenneberg published the book Biological Foundations of Language, in which he argued that humans are biologically capable of learning language only until puberty. Although there have been locations in the brain identified as language processing areas, such as Broca’s area and Wernicke’s area, a location corresponding to the LAD has not been found.Ĭhomsky’s claim that knowledge of language is innate was supported by Eric Lenneberg’s critical period hypothesis. No specific claim was made regarding the specific location of the LAD in the brain. Such brain structures are presumably present in human brains, but absent in nonhuman brains. ![]() However, neither has been able to master the intricacies involved in construction of grammatically correct sentences.Ĭhomsky’s view of the LAD is consistent with there being specific structures in the brain involved in language learning and language processing. Washoe the chimpanzee and Koko the gorilla have each learned hundreds of signs and can use them to refer to concrete objects and concepts, such as hungry. Chimpanzees and gorillas have learned to use signed languages, such as American Sign Language (ASL). ![]() Furthermore, attempts to teach nonhuman species language have yielded mixed results. Nonhuman primates and other species do not spontaneously learn human languages. According to Chomsky, humans are born with the LAD, but other species are not. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |